Fiat Chrysler and Renault: a motoring mega-merger

How to insulate your wealth from a Corbyn government

What will it take for us to value real stuff again?

The trouble with Scotlands plan to launch its own currency

Beware: the trade war between China and the US could just be the beginning

The bitcoin rollercoaster has started up again hang on tight!

Judges Scientific: a scientific mini-conglomerate

Judges Scientific: a scientific mini-conglomerate

Fiat Chrysler and Renault: a motoring mega-merger

Reasons to be cheerful about Britains economy

Running out of human workers? Better buy robots

Millions fall foul of pensions contributions rule

Why Ive changed my mind about the pension savings lifetime allowance

The trouble with Scotlands plan to launch its own currency

Gold could stagnate for several years but dont make Gordon Browns mistake

Gold could stagnate for several years but dont make Gordon Browns mistake

I hate this cheap data mining trick dont fall for it

Gold heres why it just might be different this time

Reasons to be cheerful about Britains economy

How to insulate your wealth from a Corbyn government

Italys debt is in the news again. You can ignore it but only for now

Why Ive changed my mind about the pension savings lifetime allowance

The trouble with Scotlands plan to launch its own currency

Beware: the trade war between China and the US could just be the beginning

The European elections mattered a lot more than you think

What are the bookies odds on the new Tory leader?

Why a pension is a much better investment than property

Millions fall foul of pensions contributions rule

Does owning an electric car make financial sense?

Why Ive changed my mind about the pension savings lifetime allowance

Why a pension is a much better investment than property

How to insulate your wealth from a Corbyn government

Forget Buffett: if its value stocks you want, heres what to buy

Dont sell in May this year the market is telling you its time to be long

How to stop your mind anchoring and hobbling your judgement

No Brexit and a minority government the future for Britain?

Ubers big belly flop might be good news for wider markets

Most of the funds promising to protect investors from volatile stockmarkets have produced dismal returns, says Max King.

After the excellent returns of 2016 and 2017, most equity investors steeled themselves for a difficult 2018, as the course of profitable investment never runs smoothly. And so it proved, with the FTSE All Share index losing 9.5% (including income). The MSCI World index, protected by the better performance of Wall Street and by the weakness of sterling, lost just 2.5%. A typical British investor, with less exposure to the US than the MSCIs 56% and more to the UK and smaller companies, will be down more than 5%; perhaps a bit less if the portfolio includes a good allocation to government bonds, alternative funds (such as infrastructure), or cash.

Still, three-year returns remain good: the average return of investment trusts in the global sector is 42%, while the worst performer returned 18%. Investors may have been shocked by double-digit percentage declines in value in the last quarter of 2018, and will be nervous about the outlook for 2019, but on any multi-year perspective, the stockmarket has been a profitable place to invest.

However, in recent years many investors, scarred by the 2008 financial crisis, have been persuaded to adopt lower-risk strategies. They invested in funds that missed out on much of the 2016-2017 upside in the expectation that they would be cushioned in more turbulent times. The basic idea behind these lower-risk funds was to sacrifice some upside in the good times but temper the downside in the bad times. Ideally, the long-term return would be the same, but the ride would be much smoother, especially in a volatile environment when absolute performance might be modest but would compare very favourably with the losses being suffered by conventional terms.

Funds with these strategies were declared to be seeking absolute returns, as opposed to returns relative to the market indices. As you might expect, this approach found particular favour among trustees of pension funds and charities and the consultants who advise them. These investors are entrusted with looking after other peoples money, and hence tend to be more focused on short-term risk, not least to their reputations, than on longer-term returns. Last year provided an opportunity for these funds to prove themselves but, unfortunately, many have failed the test.

Investment trusts with the absolute-return approach are grouped together in the flexible investment sector and have mostly performed satisfactorily. Their average 2018 return of -4.6% was similar to the average return in the global sector, but the three-year return, at 27%, was much lower. However, their performance in the final quarter of -5% was much better, indicating that though they lagged badly early in the year, their caution was later vindicated.Caledonia Investments (LSE: CLDN),RIT Capital Partners (LSE: RCP)andCapital Gearing (LSE: CGT)were the best performers, with positive returns for the year, whileRuffer Investment (LSE: RICA), with dismal but still positive three- and five-year returns, was the dog, losing investors 11%. But at least with Ruffer, as withPersonal Assets Trust (LSE: PNL)or Capital Gearing, you can understand why they have done well or badly, says Mark Dampier of Hargreaves Lansdown. Ruffers November fact sheet shows an allocation to index-linked bonds of more than 40%, a chunky 12% in Japanese equities, 7.5% in gold and gold equities, but 72% in sterling, which suggests currency hedging was expensive for Ruffer in 2018.

Among open-ended funds, classified as multi-strategy, no such clarity exists. The largest of these is Standard Lifes Global Absolute Return Strategies (GARS), which once had 25bn of assets plus perhaps another 25bn in similar funds or parallel accounts. Its initial success spawned imitation funds from Aviva, Invesco and others, but nearly all are floundering. In the three years to the end of November, GARS returned -6.6%, Aviva -2.9% and Invesco -1.2% for the institutional share classes. These funds were conceived to mimic macro-trading hedge funds, but without the extortionate fees, traditionally 2 and 20 (2% annual fee plus 20% of all performance). They claimed an absolute-return approach, targeting returns of 5% over interest rates, before fees, over rolling three-year periods.

The problem is that investors dont understand these funds, as they are too complex, with 25-30 different trading strategies at any one time, says Dampier. Macro-economic and strategic forecasting is way harder than stock-picking, and you cant de-risk an investment strategy without losing the returns, he says. But Dampier doesnt just blame the managers. The problem is that clients by and large want low risk They are looking for equity-type returns, but dont want full equity risk, as they are not good at coping with volatility. The investment industry spends much of its time trying to turn lead into gold and, not surprisingly, ends up disappointing investors.

Terence Moll, head of strategy at Seven Investment Management, is a long-standing sceptic about hedge funds and their open-ended mimics. These funds ought to perform better owing to their lower fees, but the best strategies tend to go into the hedge funds, while the open-ended funds are left with the more liquid but lower-return ideas, he says. They also take less overall risk than the hedge funds, which results in their performance being no better. GARS was sold as a way to invest in clever, complex strategies, he says. Now faith has been lost.

Moll points out that the returns of funds that avoid market risk are dependent on alpha the value added by managers skill yet after costs, there seems to be very little positive alpha in the world. Additionally, managers look for market inefficiencies that can be exploited and valuations, whether of equities, bonds or currencies, that are out of line and will revert to fair value. But, as economist John Maynard Keynes observed, markets can stay irrational for longer than you can stay solvent.

Such is the number of investors and weight of money looking for anomalies or mining the historic data for patterns that can be profitably exploited, Moll points out, that the opportunity often proves illusory or, if not, the capacity is quickly used up. Besides, there are 325,000 subscribers with Bloomberg terminals worldwide, so desk-based investment strategies building on the information they provide are extremely unlikely to give any investor a competitive edge. As John Le Carr writes, a desk is a dangerous place from which to view the world.

The record of the multi-strategy funds ranges from wretched to awful. Yet one leads the sector by a mile: Veritas Global Real Return fund returned 7% in the year to 30 November, and 41% over three years, using a simpler strategy than competitors. It invests in high-quality global equities for the long term, hedging out equity risk as appropriate through options and futures (arrangements to buy assets in the future, either as a right or an agreement). Unsurprisingly, Baillie Giffords Diversified Growth Fund is also better than most. It returned 9.6% over the three years to the end of November, and 18.4% over five. This is below the target of inflation plus 3.5% per year over five years, but isnt wildly off. It invests in other Baillie Gifford funds, as well as directly in bonds, commodities and closed-end funds. Schroders Diversified Growth Fund had a higher returns target of inflation plus 5% per year, indicating greater appetite for risk, but managed just 6.5% over the same three years and 14.7% over five years. The returns from BlackRock are lower still. The record for Investec Asset Managements copycat fund is even worse: negative over three years even for institutional investors, before Decembers tsunami of red. Diversified growth is clearly a misnomer for most of these funds.

If few multi-strategy, absolute-return or diversified-growth funds have performed well in either the good or the difficult times, when will they deliver? I dont see them catching up easily, says Dampier. Despite this, investors are not good at coping with the very volatility we are seeing now, so disappointing performance wont stop investors demanding the impossible: risk-free returns. He wouldnt be surprised to see new fund launches and another cycle of hubris to nemesis launched.

By contrast, the with-profits funds, which once dominated the market (owing to the ability of the insurance companies that managed them to smooth returns over the years) are unlikely to return, as they lack transparency and the withholding of returns in secret reserves is unfair to investors. Balanced or cautious-managed funds, which invest in a constrained mix of equities and bonds, once flourished, and might return to favour, but Dampier is sceptical. They did well in the multi-decade bull market for bonds when equities were also trending upwards, he says. But the long bull market is over and bonds, particularly in the UK and Europe, may now represent what James Grant, editor of Grants Interest Rate Observer, called return-free risk.

Dampiers longer-term advice to investors is to go for a mixture of equity exposure and cash. The more cautious the investor, the more cash should be held. This not only limits the erosion of capital in bad times, but also means there will then be cash available to top up equity exposure. Current market weakness provides an excellent opportunity for those holding GARS-type funds out of choice to switch into conventional equity funds. Those locked into such funds through collective pension schemes need to put pressure on their trustees if they want to avoid a delayed and miserable retirement.

In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run it is a weighing machine, said legendary investor Benjamin Graham. In other words, investors should ride out market turbulence to harvest the long-term returns that equity markets offer.

Why did anyone ever believe that a complicated fund dependent on managers with the Midas touch juggling a broad range of elaborate trading strategies could possibly work any better?

With so much uncertainty, theres never been a more important time to secure your financial future.Try out MoneyWeek todayand find out how to make the most of what you have.

The European Parliamentary elections and PM Theresa Mays resignation have opened up a path to power for a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn, and hes not exactly investor-friendly.

To find out whats going on in the markets, how the days developments will affect your wealth, plus the latest investment opportunities,sign up to our free daily Money Morning email.

Fiat Chrysler and Renault: a motoring mega-merger

The governments determination to make the buy-to-let sector less appealing to investors seems to have worked, with landlords suffering a dismal few years.

Millions fall foul of pensions contributions rule

Almost a million savers could face punitive tax charges on their pension contributions because they have unwittingly triggered a substantial reduction in their annual contributions allowance.

The European elections mattered a lot more than you think

The European elections revealed nothing more than that the country is still as divided as ever about Brexit. So, whats changed? Well, says John Stepek quite a lot actually.

Registered office: 31-32 Alfred Place, London, WC1E 7DP. Registered in England with company no. 04016750 and VAT no. GB 494 6163 17. MoneyWeek and Money Morning are registered trademarks.