The FCA has warned fund groups it continues to harbour concerns aboutthe potentially misleading performance reporting usedfor absolute return strategies, suggesting the products are ripe for an overhaul.

In the final report fromits asset management market study, the regulatorsaid it was still concerned abouthow fund firms report absolute return fund performance, as well as a broader disparity of approach from such products.

We are concerned that many absolute return funds do not report their performance against the relevant target return, said the regulator.

We also agree that the wide range of charges and targets could be confusing to retail investors, and is unlikely to help investors compare performance even within the absolute return sub-sector.

The products were consistently mentioned in the report, which also saw the watchdog decide to consult on new requirements around performance reporting.

An absolute return funds most ambitious target may be Libor plus 4 per cent. If we bring in such rules, their effect would be to make clear that, where the [fund firm] chooses or is required to display the funds past performance, it must show the past performance against Libor plus 4 per cent, and not against Liboralone, the FCA said.

The FCA also decided to consult on rules thatonly allow performance fees to be charged when a fund outperforms the samemost ambitious target. This was after evidence emerged thatabsolute return productsin particular charged such fees afterbeating Libor, despite having a potentially higher target.

The FCA said: Some [fund firms]charge performance fees for achieving a level of return below the most ambitious target they hold out to investors, for example in absolute return funds. We are considering consulting on rules so that performance fees are only permitted above the funds most ambitious target, consistent with our proposals on performance reporting.

The plans to consult on possible new rulesfollow somehighly critical comments from the FCA in its interim report, published last November.

At the time the regulator said it found customers faced a relatively high likelihood of negative performance in the 74 absolute return products analysed.

The FCA added in its final reportthat during its consultation period, several respondents raised concerns about the products, including their complexity, wide range of targets and lack of common definition for the term.

It added: This included requests for us to investigate how prevalent specific performance targets are, how professional fund investors measure performance and whether performance outcomes were being achieved.

The disparity of both returns and approaches within the Investment Associations Targeted Absolute Return sectorhas long been a contentious issue. This has been compounded by the popularity of the group, which had the strongest net retail sales among all the IA sectorsin2016.

The sectortook in 5.1bnin a year when fund sales more generally were down compared with previous years.

Financial Adviser is the premier weekly newspaper for UK based financial intermediaries.

Money Management is the professionals independent adviser, containing a wealth of in-depth features and unique fund performance statistics.

The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice:

© The Financial Times Ltd 2019 FT, Financial Times, Money Management, FTAdviser and Financial Adviser are trademarks of The Financial Times Limited and their associated companies. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form without prior permission in writing from the editor.